|
|
I install quite a number of internet gateway machines for one of my clients. While eventually he will probably move to using an ASUS EeePC [1] or something similar, the current plan is to keep using desktop PCs (unfortunately server-class machines make too much noise).
P4 machines use an unreasonable amount of power and don’t seem worth getting second-hand. P3 machines are the most power efficient machines that have been commodity PCs (with keyboard and monitor), see my computer power use document for an example [2].
So what I would like is to get a dozen name-brand P3 systems at a reasonable price. Currently the only companies I can find selling such machines are charging ridiculous prices (such as $300) with the aim of reaming corporations who want to complete a set of old machines rather than upgrading them all. Most online auctions etc are selling P4 and Celeron 2GHz as the minimum hardware. The Celeron machines are better than P4 (at around 50W) but not as good as P3 (at less than 40W).
If you read this post and are in Melbourne, Australia and have a name-brand P3 desktop system that you want to sell then let me know. If you have any suggestions of how to buy such machines then I’m interested in advice.
I’ve just been reading about oil deterioration when deep frying [1]. Apparently frying food can cause the production of Acrylamide [2] which causes cancer, is a neurotoxin, and does other bad things to your body. Deep frying in a vacuum [3] is a solution to this problem as the lower temperatures reduce the formation of the bad chemicals (and also increase the life of the oil thus making for cheaper fried products). Of course this means that deep frying in a pressure cooker as KFC does probably gives a result that is a lot worse for your health [4].
For some time I’ve been avoiding KFC due to concerns about the treatment of the chickens. I have been regularly eating fried chicken from a local store which looks and tastes very similar to KFC so presumably is cooked in the same way. I guess I’ll have to stop eating that now.
I wonder if toast is also bad in this regard. I expect that sausages would be a problem when cooked on a BBQ.
In other health news I’ve been reducing my meat consumption and I’m considering trying to entirely avoid farm raised animals to restrict my meat consumption to game meat, this should be good for my health and is also a lot better for the animals and the environment.
For some time I have been running Google Adsense adverts on my blog. Not long after I started running the adverts the revenue exceeded the amount of money I pay for net access, so it’s worth having.
I recently increased the amount of advertising by including an advert in the middle of the post and received one negative comment from a reader who doesn’t like reading content with adverts in the middle. I have just changed my advertising to have that advert spot in question be before the start of the content rather than in the middle (I’m not sure if that will make them more or less happy). It seems expected nowadays that there will be a moderate amount of advertising on all web sites which have good content and don’t charge membership fees, many of my blog posts cite as references pages on web servers run by media companies that have significant amounts of advertising.
Chris Samuel is considering implementing advertising [1] and is planning to not display adverts to “friends” (which means people who have commented or who are referred by social media sites).
One significant problem with this idea is that sometimes the adverts become part of the blog conversation. Google adverts give an idea of which of the things that people are prepared to pay money for are considered by the Google algorithm to be related to the post in question. In my experience it’s not uncommon for people who comment on blog posts (both through the blog interface and through private correspondence) to reference the contents of adverts. Also while writing this post I updated my post about car sharing because I discovered a third car-share company through the adverts on my own blog [2]. I know one professional journalist who blocks the adverts on his own site so that his writing will not be biased (or be perceived to be biased) by his advertisers (which makes sense given his situation), but for my situation it clearly makes sense to review the advertised offerings of all three companies that compete in this space in Melbourne and there is no potential for bias (incidentally all three of them are advertising on my blog post).
A problem with giving a different version of the content for friends (in the more traditional meaning of the word – as opposed to using the word to mean people who have visited your blog in a certain way) is that they will not be able to correctly review your web site. I regularly notify friends and people who do worthy things of deficiencies that I discover in their web sites and occasionally receive such notifications from other people. I don’t want to have bugs in my site concealed from friendly people who would like to help me out and displayed to random people who don’t care and will respond by visiting another site.
When such things are discussed one topic that is mentioned is putting advertising in an RSS feed. I have no plans to do this, such RSS advertising would not be acceptable to Planet installations, but it would not be technically challenging to give an advert free feed to Planets but give adverts to everyone else. I think that most people who read my blog through RSS feeds will see adverts when they want to comment on my posts or when they want to forward the URLs or reference them in their own blog posts (always click on the permalink before forwarding – when a blogger messes up their permalinks it’s embarrassing if you forward them without checking).
So I encourage Chris to put adverts on his blog and to show them to me.
Steve Kemp writes about security issues with C programs [1]. It seems obvious that if you are going to do something that is overly tricky (such as anything related to setuid programs) then you should have a good knowledge of what you are doing. Steve goes a little further and suggests that anyone who doesn’t know C should not package a C program.
Andrew Pollock is a Debian developer who doesn’t program in C and yet packages some C programs, he explains why he thinks that it’s correct to forward C coding bugs upstream [2].
In this debate I have more sympathy for Steve’s position. Security is one of the most important things in software that we develop, if you can’t develop secure software then IMHO you shouldn’t distribute any software. Although it should be noted that the two posts in question don’t directly conflict. Steve’s main point (your should know the code well to do something relevant to security) does not directly conflict with Andrew’s main point that a non-C coder can maintain the Debian packaging files and forward bug reports related to C code upstream.
In the more general case it’s often impossible to know all languages used in a project. It’s not uncommon for a single project to have core code written in C, a configuration file format (which is a programming language), a Makefile (GNU Make is a fairly complex interpreter), Autoconf/Automake (even more complex tools for creating complex Makefiles, and then some Perl or Python to manipulate input or output data. The SE Linux project has code in all those languages plus the M4 macro language. It seems obvious that in a large project the number of people who are capable of understanding all languages which are used is going to be a small sub-set of all Debian Developers. It also seems likely that someone who knows some of the languages really well may be capable of doing a better job than someone who has a passable knowledge of all of them.
For the vast majority of my work in Debian I have been a member of the upstream project in question (for Bonnie++, Postal, Portslave, Maildir-bulletin, and logtools I’m the sole upstream developer). Often I start maintaining a package with the intent of doing the minimum needed to keep it maintained in Debian but then end up doing upstream work, for example I briefly had write access to the CVS repository for pppd when I was maintaining it and I had write access to the KDE CVS repository when I was working on KDE packages (which incidentally was before I became an official DD).
When I first started working on the SE Linux project I aimed to merely package the code in question for Debian. I was not planning on spending seven years doing upstream work!
When I’m working on a project I spend my time working on the things that most need attention. That often means that I get diverted from Debian packaging bugs (which are often minor issues) to work on upstream bugs. In many ways my work practices make me a Debian user and upstream developer who also does Debian packaging rather than a dedicated DD. This of course does have a detrimental affect on the quality of my Debian packaging work – but overall I believe that it’s best for the users!
As an upstream developer who is focussed on Debian there are significant advantages in being a DD. I can immediately upload a new package to Unstable without any delay, and there is the potential to take over a related package (either be given the package or NMU) if it’s the best way to get around a roadblock. Another benefit is that in certain limited situations I can speak on behalf of Debian (in terms of packages I “own”). When it comes to upstream development of SE Linux I can make decisions about how things will be done in Debian and work with other upstream developers to ensure that cross-distribution compatibility works reasonably well.
It seems to me that a fairly ideal process for managing Debian development would have the people who are capable of the hard coding doing so and some people who haven’t got specific coding skills working on the packaging. I would be very interested in receiving patches related to the Debian packaging of the packages I “own” (in Debian it’s widely regarded that a man’s package is his castle) so that I can spend more of my time on the C coding. I’m not bothered about NMUs (a Non-Maintainer Upload – is when someone else uploads a new version of one of my packages to fix a bug). If anyone would like to NMU one of my packages they are welcome to do so as long as there is a suitable combination of bug urgency, simplicity of the fix, and lack of response from me. If someone wants to start NMUing my packages to fix bugs reported by the latest version of Lintian in Unstable (Lintian is the Debian tool to automatically check for packaging bugs) then that’s OK.
Of course there are a variety of other situations that DDs sometimes find themselves in. There have been situations of overtly hostile upstream developers. I try and avoid associating with people who have certain difficulties in interacting with others. If someone is going to change their license and try to back-date the change or create a license that makes it difficult to distribute modified versions of the code then I’m inclined to avoid even using the software, let alone being involved in developing it. This means that the software that I use in any serious way has reasonable people doing upstream development who welcome new people to join their work.
Recently I noticed that some parking spots in the city area are reserved for car sharing. There seems to be two car sharing companies operating.
Flexicar [1] costs $50 to join, has a $10 per month membership fee (which includes one hour of driving at a value of $12), and costs $12 per hour or $80 per day to drive a car plus $0.15 per Km if you drive more than 100Km in a day. They also have pre-paid plans which bring all the guesswork and complexity of mobile phone bills to car rental. Also they give discounts to members of the City Rewards [2] program which are greater than the membership cost, so anyone who plans to join them should join City Rewards first.
To use a car you phone up or use their web site to make a reservation. Then you find the car you reserved at it’s designated location and swipe your card across the windscreen to unlock the doors (presumably it’s an RFID card). The glovebox has the key for the ignition as well as fuel cards for any fuel you use a BP, Shell, and Caltex petrol stations (presumably if you run low on petrol when not near those ones you end up paying). All you pay is the rental rate and any tolls for toll roads you use.
When someone doesn’t return the vehicle to it’s designated spot on time there are penalty rates, which may include the cost of a taxi fare for the next person who had booked it.
It seems like a really good idea that can save significant amounts of money for people who live in the central areas (the costs of maintaining and insuring a car are significant, as is the depreciation on a new car as an asset).
The competitor is Charterdrive [3] which costs $25 to join (less than Flexicar but the same once you consider the discount), the same $10 per hour for 8:30AM to 5:30PM hours, and then cheaper rates for evenings and weekends. $25 for a night (5:30PM to 8:30AM the next morning) is good value if you want to drive home from work and then return the next day (if you work late then you might expect to pay $30 or more for a single taxi ride to get home). The weekend rate of $90 for 5:30 Friday to 8:30 Monday is also quite competitive, I expect that there are many people who only use a car on the weekend who could benefit a lot from this. $90 per weekend for 40 weekends a year (some weekends you would stay home or just use public transport) is $3600, insurance, registration, and basic maintenance of a car that you would want to own would cover most of that. Charterdrive does charge $0.20 per Km though for all journeys (with a discount rate of $0.15 per Km for long journeys on some plans), as opposed to Flexicar only charging $0.15 per Km for distances in excess of 100Km per day.
Charterdrive seems to be a newer company and has a far smaller presence. But it’s business model seems a little different and the focus on renting cars for people to drive home means that some people might benefit from being members of both companies. The $0.20 per Km makes Charterdrive more expensive more expensive for most city use, and the discounts offered for Flexicar seem to make it cheaper for use during business hours.
Charterdrive states that they have a deal with Red Spot Car Rentals [4]. It is not stated on their web site if you want to use one of their cars and they are all in use, I wonder whether a Red Spot car would be provided for the same price. Flexicar however claims that they aim to have a ratio of cars to members sufficient to make such things unlikely. Maybe it would be prudent to join both organisations so that if one had no vehicles available then you could use the other? In one city car park that I often pass the Flexicar and Charterdrive parking spots are adjacent so there would be no difference in convenience in terms of which one you use.
I wonder whether they will continue getting adjacent spots. If many people join both organisations then it would be more effective if they don’t get adjacent spots to get better aggregate coverage. I think that at the moment the main challenge for both companies is to grow the popularity of the car-sharing business. I expect that the real competition for who gets the biggest slice of that business will happen in a few years time.
Update:
There is another Australian car-share company in operation named GoGet [5], interestingly I discovered their existence when I reviewed the Google advertising on this post…
GoGet has a significant presence in Sydney, a small presence in Melbourne, and is only making a start in Queensland. Their hourly rates are significantly lower than the others (as little as $4.40 per hour) but distance rates are as high as $0.35 per Km. One significant benefit is that they have plans for two or three drivers which could allow an entire family to sign up on one account. If you drive less than 20Km in an hour (which would not be uncommon in city driving) then GoGet would be cheapest.
Today I happened to see a bio-fuel petrol station! I decided to check it out (even though I was traveling by tram in a part of town that I don’t normally visit so there was no possibility of any real purchase).
The station is Conservo [1]. Their main products are E10 petrol (10% Ethanol and 90% Petrol), B20 bio-Diesel (20% bio-Diesel and 80% Petroleum based fuel oil), and B100 (100% bio-Diesel). All the fuel that they sell has a biological based component. The prices for the fuel seemed a little lower than is charged by other petrol stations, but it’s difficult to tell as fuel prices can change rapidly.
I spoke to one customer who had just filled up his 4WD with bio-Diesel about his experiences. He said that he sometimes used B20 and sometimes B100. He had found no down-side to using such fuels but had noticed that when under hard acceleration the bio-Diesel fuel seemed to cause less dark smoke (IE less soot).
All the fuels that they sell are produced in Australia. There are issues with imported bio-fuels which are sometimes produced with slash and burn agriculture and often increase the prices for essential food items (such as corn in South America). As the fuel is produced in Australia such issues should not apply. According to a brochure they have facilities to allow people to deposit used vegetable oil which can then be converted to bio-Diesel.
Inside the store they sell a variety of organic foods and drinks, I bought a bottle of carbonated organic apple juice which was quite nice and at $3 was not outside the price range that I expect from a petrol station (which do tend to charge high rates for refreshments). It was not an unreasonably high price for an organic drink.
In the store they sell and promote a range of producthttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flash_points that are positive for the environment. They have a display about using algae to produce bio-Diesel fuel which has some interesting information but unfortunately didn’t list the productivity of algae fields in terms of the number of tons per hectare per year (or month or other time period).
One really interesting point I read on their web site concerns the flash point [2] of fuel. The flash-point is the temperature which allows enough of the flammable substance to evaporate to produce an ignitable mixture. Petrol is listed as less than -40C, fossil-Diesel fuel is greater than 62C according to Wikipedia (greater than 55C according to Conservo) while Conservo list the flash point of bio-Diesel as greater than 110C. Wikipedia lists the flash point of canola (rape seed) oil as 327C. This is described as being a benefit of bio-Diesel. While it’s obvious that this is a disadvantage for Petrol, I find it difficult to imagine a situation where a fuel tank could reach a temperature greater than 55C but less than 110C.
In their Good for the Environment [3] page they claim that the exhaust from burning bio-Diesel is less harmful to human health than that from burning fossil fuels. My previous post about Vegie Cars [4] is getting some comments suggesting otherwise. So far I haven’t found good references either way, but the discussion has raised some really good issues.
Update: Petrol’s flash-point is less than -40C not +40C.
I’ve read a lot about running Diesel vehicles on plant oil, but one thing that was never clear was why some people claim that you need special chemical additives.
The article about converting vehicles to vegetable oil on the VegieCars.com [1] site explains all this. It seems that if you want to produce fuel which can be used in unmodified vehicles then you need to add a mixture of methanol caustic soda. This is going to be difficult, dangerous, have some expense, and probably not be that good for the environment.
The other option (which they recommend) is to modify the vehicle to accept straight vegetable oil. This means pre-heating the oil before it enters the engine (to lower it’s viscosity and make it vaporise more easily) and to filter the oil to remove solid objects and water.
A possibility is to have two separate fuel tanks so that you can switch between plant oil and petroleum based Diesel fuel. This is an option if driving in a cold climate (probably not an issue in Australia apart from a few mountains) and if you are concerned about the quality of your plant oil (a bad batch could clog the filters and force you to use petroleum based fuel).
They also have an interesting cost-comparison page to show you how much money you might save by using plant oil [2].
Their site is very interesting and has some good technical information, even if you never plan to drive a Diesel vehicle it’s worth reading if you are interested in cars.
My cousin Greg Coker has created an eBay auction for Football cards with the proceeds going to a charity that protects animal welfare (I can’t remember the name – I’ll update this post later). He also has a bunch of other eBay auctions of football cards going which are not for charity.
The charity auction is held in association with SEN (Sports Entertainment Network – a sports talk-back AM radio station) [1]. This afternoon Greg was interviewed on SEN about football cards in general. He gave a good talk, he could probably do some professional radio work if he was interested.
Greg’s cards are from the VFL (Victorian Football League) before it became the AFL (Australian Football League) [2]. The cards used to be sold in “milk bars” (small stores that sold a variety of junk food and some essential food items including milk – most such stores are closed now as they have been replaced by petrol stations and supermarkets) and each pack of ~5 cards had some crewing gum included (which Greg often discarded because he didn’t like it – he should have given it to me, I was not so fussy). The back side of the cards had a jigsaw picture which I have never seen anyone complete (I expect that Greg has assembled at least one jigsaw as he has some sets).
Probably the way the cards were collected, traded, etc is very similar to sports based cards from other countries (such as baseball cards in the US).
On the animal front, I’ve had a mother cat and four kittens move into the shed in my back-yard. The mother cat has no collar and is not known by anyone in the area so she appears to have been dumped by her owner when she got pregnant. There are four kittens, one is ginger, one is black, and two are mottled part black and part ginger. They are all healthy and friendly and the kittens are all really cute. The kittens have become used to being patted and handled by humans so it will be easy to make them household pets.
If an owner is not found for them then they will probably all end up being put to sleep (unfortunately I can’t keep them so I’ll have to deliver them to the local council).
If anyone in Melbourne, Australia wants some free cats then I would be happy to deliver them. I’ll supply as many cats as desired. I can’t give away the mother until the kittens have been given away, so if you want the mother cat (dark coloured) then you may have to wait for a while.
Judging by the date that I first noticed them (when they were walking around, had their eyes open, and ate solid food) the kittens would have to be at least 7 weeks old. It’s recommended that kittens not be given away before they are 8 weeks old and given that it will probably take a week to organise anything I expect that anyone who reads I don’t think that there is any risk of giving them away too early.
Please let me know by email or a comment if you are in the vicinity of Melbourne, Australia and want a new pet (or several new pets).
The latest news related to the Beijing Olympic games is that Kevin Rudd (our Prime Minister) has said “It is absolutely clear that there are human rights abuses in Tibet. That’s clear-cut; we need to be upfront and absolutely straight about what’s going on,” – stating the obvious really. If that was all that happened then it wouldn’t be particularly interesting.
The paper version of “The Age” quotes George Bush as seconding Kevin Rudd’s statement. I believe that this is quite significant. Bush is well known for being stupid, the fact that he is now following the example of someone else who is doing good things is a very positive thing for the world. When John Howard was our Prime Minister we had an idiot (Howard) following an even bigger idiot (Bush) and the result was not good.
Kevan Gosper (an Australian IOC board member) said “They just take their hate out on whatever the issues are at the time, and that hate against the host country is being taken out on our torch“. People who are totally corrupt sometimes seem confused when other people are motivated by moral principles, maybe we have a culture clash between the corrupt IOC board and the attitudes of most people in the rest of the world (I can’t think of any other way to map Kevan’s statement to reality).
Mr Rudd has confirmed that Chinese “security guards” (soldiers) will not be permitted to operate in Australia to protect the Olympic torch from protesters, but the “security guards” have been operating in the UK.
I read about this on the web site of The Age, but I won’t link to them because they have a lot of broken links with the following explanation – I am not going to link to sites that are so transient in nature (linking to The Age would lower the quality of my blog). Incidentally does anyone know of a news service in Australia that has reliable pages which stay online?
We could not find the page you requested. This is often because older content has been removed from our site. In most cases you can still find the item via our archive service, News Store, where you can buy articles for a small fee.
It also has the following text which indicates that the most visible problem is probably transient, but the fact that they deliberately break links is unacceptable to me:
If you reached this page from a link on our site, please contact the webmaster (choose Technical faults) and tell us the address of the faulty page and the address shown for this page.
The MSN article about the meeting between Bush and Rudd also had an interesting quote from Nancy Pelosi (speaker of the house in the US congress) [1]. She said “As I said in India last week where I met with His Holiness the Dalai Lama, if freedom-loving people throughout the world do not speak out against China’s oppression in Tibet, we have lost our moral authority to speak out on behalf of human rights anywhere in the world” and that the IOC made a mistake in awarding the games to China.
Pelosi is not known for being left-wing (the US Democratic party is centrist/right by the standards of most democracies) so it’s interesting to see her take a stand on this issue.
Erich Schubert has written about this, he points out that the Olympics are not about sports [2]. Well of course the Olympics are about money, drugs, and sports-science!
I’m not sure that I agree with Schubert and Pelosi, the Chinese Olympics has focussed a lot of international attention on what China is doing – this has to be good for human rights. The Olympic games are a white elephant, running them costs a huge amount of money and there is no evidence that they actually make money for the host country once the opportunity costs are taken into account. Maybe we should give the Olympics to Zimbabwe or the Sudan next?
|
|
