I Won’t Use Drizzle


A couple of days ago I attended a lecture about the Drizzle database server [1].

Drizzle is a re-write of MySQL for use in large web applications. It is only going to run on 64bit platforms because apparently everyone uses 64bit servers – except of course people who are Amazon EC2 customers as the $0.10 per hour instances in EC2 are all 32bit. It’s also designed to use large amounts of RAM for more aggressive caching, it’s being optimised for large RAM at the expense of performance on systems with small amounts of RAM. This is OK if you buy one (or many) new servers to dedicate to the task of running a database. But if a database is one of many tasks running on the machine, or if the machine is a Xen instance then this isn’t going to be good.

There are currently no plans to support replication between MySQL and Drizzle databases (although it would not be impossible to write the support).

The good news is that regular MySQL development will apparently continue in the same manner as before, so people who have small systems, run on Xen instances, or use EC2 can keep using that. Drizzle seems just aimed at people who want to run very large sharded databases.

Now I just wish that they would introduce checksums on all data transfers and stores into MySQL. I consider that to be a really significant feature of Drizzle.

4 thoughts on “I Won’t Use Drizzle”

  1. mvngu says:

    From my perspective, I like the design of Drizzle as Stewart mentioned that it’s (sort of like) a microkernel design. This reminds me of the time when Richard Stallman was trying to develop the Hurd kernel, which also used the same design. At first, the development of Hurd was difficult because debugging the servers that run on top of the core kernel was very difficult. Eventually, Hurd was ready for use. At least we now know that there’s one project that uses a microkernel design. It’ll be interesting to keep up with the progress of Drizzle.

  2. Optimised for 64bit yes, will still run on 32 though.

    as for higher memory requirements – nothing solid as of yet, but the mantra is “must run in parallel, burn memory if enables higher parallelism”

  3. Chris Samuel says:

    Stewart didn’t say that it was 64-bit only, only that it was going to be optimised for 64-bit.

    As the Drizzle FAQ says:

    We support both 32bit and 64bit but the class of machine we are targetting is 64bit.

  4. Arjen Lentz says:

    OurDelta (http://ourdelta.org/) now provides (free) enhanced builds for MySQL, incorporating patches that help monitoring/administration as well as performance.

    Neat packages simply available through YUM and APT repos.

Comments are closed.