The Hetzner server that hosts my blog among other things has 2*256G SSDs for the root filesystem. The smartctl and smartd programs report both SSDs as in FAILING_NOW state for the Wear_Leveling_Count attribute. I don’t have a lot of faith in SMART. I run it because it would be stupid not to consider data about possible drive problems, but don’t feel obliged to immediately replace disks with SMART errors when not convenient (if I ordered a new server and got those results I would demand replacement before going live).

Doing any sort of SMART scan will cause service outage. Replacing devices means 2 outages, 1 for each device.

I noticed the SMART errors 2 weeks ago, so I guess that the SMART claims that both of the drives are likely to fail within 24 hours have been disproved. The system is running BTRFS so I know there aren’t any unseen data corruption issues and it uses BTRFS RAID-1 so if one disk has an unreadable sector that won’t cause data loss.

Currently Hetzner Server Bidding has ridiculous offerings for systems with SSD storage. Search for a server with 16G of RAM and SSD storage and the minimum prices are only 2E cheaper than a new server with 64G of RAM and 2*512G NVMe. In the past Server Bidding has had servers with specs not much smaller than the newest systems going for rates well below the costs of the newer systems. The current Hetzner server is under a contract from Server Bidding which is significantly cheaper than the current Server Bidding offerings, so financially it wouldn’t be a good plan to replace the server now.


I have just released a new version of etbe-mon [1] which has a new monitor for SMART data (smartctl). It also has a change to the sslcert check to search all IPv6 and IPv4 addresses for each hostname, makes freespace check look for filesystem mountpoint, and makes the smtpswaks check use latest swaks command-line.

For the new smartctl check there is an option to treat “Marginal” alert status from smartctl as errors and there is an option to name attributes that will be treated as marginal even if smartctl thinks they are significant. So now I have my monitoring system checking the SMART data on the servers of mine which have real hard drives (not VMs) and aren’t using RAID hardware that obscures such things. Also it’s not alerting me about the Wear_Leveling_Count on that particular Hetzner server.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>