<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Laptop Reliability</title>
	<atom:link href="http://etbe.coker.com.au/2009/11/23/laptop-reliability/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://etbe.coker.com.au/2009/11/23/laptop-reliability/</link>
	<description>Linux, politics, and other interesting things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:09:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: etbe</title>
		<link>http://etbe.coker.com.au/2009/11/23/laptop-reliability/comment-page-1/#comment-21648</link>
		<dc:creator>etbe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 02:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etbe.coker.com.au/?p=1432#comment-21648</guid>
		<description>Anon#2: Thanks for that, I have updated the post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anon#2: Thanks for that, I have updated the post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://etbe.coker.com.au/2009/11/23/laptop-reliability/comment-page-1/#comment-21645</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:26:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etbe.coker.com.au/?p=1432#comment-21645</guid>
		<description>This analysis has some good points to make on the statistical validity of the report:

http://tumbledry.org/2009/11/20/when_information_overwhelms</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This analysis has some good points to make on the statistical validity of the report:</p>
<p><a href="http://tumbledry.org/2009/11/20/when_information_overwhelms" rel="nofollow">http://tumbledry.org/2009/11/20/when_information_overwhelms</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: etbe</title>
		<link>http://etbe.coker.com.au/2009/11/23/laptop-reliability/comment-page-1/#comment-21563</link>
		<dc:creator>etbe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 08:18:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etbe.coker.com.au/?p=1432#comment-21563</guid>
		<description>Anon: I agree that there is a potential for such a bias.  I believe that Lenovo suffers in this regard.

But I am not convinced that ASUS is avoided by technical people.  The EeePC seems wildly popular among technicians.  The Toshiba Satellite was also quite popular a few years ago for similar use.

Recently based on my positive experience with my EeePC I&#039;ve been more inclined to consider an ASUS laptop too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anon: I agree that there is a potential for such a bias.  I believe that Lenovo suffers in this regard.</p>
<p>But I am not convinced that ASUS is avoided by technical people.  The EeePC seems wildly popular among technicians.  The Toshiba Satellite was also quite popular a few years ago for similar use.</p>
<p>Recently based on my positive experience with my EeePC I&#8217;ve been more inclined to consider an ASUS laptop too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://etbe.coker.com.au/2009/11/23/laptop-reliability/comment-page-1/#comment-21560</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 06:08:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etbe.coker.com.au/?p=1432#comment-21560</guid>
		<description>The report lists Toshiba and ASUS as the most reliable laptops.  I find myself asking whether perhaps these statistics get biased towards those laptops that technical (and thus demanding) users tend to avoid.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The report lists Toshiba and ASUS as the most reliable laptops.  I find myself asking whether perhaps these statistics get biased towards those laptops that technical (and thus demanding) users tend to avoid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

