<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EC2 and IP Addresses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://etbe.coker.com.au/2008/11/06/ec2-and-ip-addresses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://etbe.coker.com.au/2008/11/06/ec2-and-ip-addresses/</link>
	<description>Linux, politics, and other interesting things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:09:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Justin Mason</title>
		<link>http://etbe.coker.com.au/2008/11/06/ec2-and-ip-addresses/comment-page-1/#comment-16656</link>
		<dc:creator>Justin Mason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 15:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etbe.coker.com.au/?p=890#comment-16656</guid>
		<description>Yes, EC2 is a natural way to deal with &quot;bad weather&quot; in SMTP terms.  I&#039;ve blogged about this in the past:

http://taint.org/2006/11/29/005418a.html
http://taint.org/2006/11/30/154423a.html

fwiw, SpamAssassin nowadays supports this quite nicely, with TLS support in the spamd/spamc protocol, so a scalable cloud of spam-scanners is entirely doable ;)

&#039;Taking a few minutes to assign an IP address is usually no big deal, but having an IP address be unusable for a few minutes while in the process of transitioning between servers would be quite inconvenient.&#039;

This is indeed the case, and yes, it&#039;s a big problem :(  I&#039;ve had Elastic IPs take 20 minutes to switch fully.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, EC2 is a natural way to deal with &#8220;bad weather&#8221; in SMTP terms.  I&#8217;ve blogged about this in the past:</p>
<p><a href="http://taint.org/2006/11/29/005418a.html" rel="nofollow">http://taint.org/2006/11/29/005418a.html</a><br />
<a href="http://taint.org/2006/11/30/154423a.html" rel="nofollow">http://taint.org/2006/11/30/154423a.html</a></p>
<p>fwiw, SpamAssassin nowadays supports this quite nicely, with TLS support in the spamd/spamc protocol, so a scalable cloud of spam-scanners is entirely doable ;)</p>
<p>&#8216;Taking a few minutes to assign an IP address is usually no big deal, but having an IP address be unusable for a few minutes while in the process of transitioning between servers would be quite inconvenient.&#8217;</p>
<p>This is indeed the case, and yes, it&#8217;s a big problem :(  I&#8217;ve had Elastic IPs take 20 minutes to switch fully.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

