<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Oracle Unbreakable Linux</title>
	<atom:link href="http://etbe.coker.com.au/2008/02/18/oracle-unbreakable-linux/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://etbe.coker.com.au/2008/02/18/oracle-unbreakable-linux/</link>
	<description>Linux, politics, and other interesting things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Sep 2010 12:36:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: etbe</title>
		<link>http://etbe.coker.com.au/2008/02/18/oracle-unbreakable-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-12304</link>
		<dc:creator>etbe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 11:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etbe.coker.com.au/2008/02/18/oracle-unbreakable-linux/#comment-12304</guid>
		<description>Alan: I know that there are many heavy applications that use Oracle databases.  But the vast majority of database installations are on the low end.  My observation is that a good number of Oracle systems really have low end requirements.  Of the systems that I&#039;ve run which had Oracle installed, they all could have had flat-files used for their databases without any problems.
Keep in mind the fact that VolksWagen bought Bentley, BMW bought Rolls-Royce Motors, and McDonalds is the world&#039;s most profitable &quot;restaurant&quot; chain.  Any company that restricts itself to the high end risks becoming less profitable than one that caters for the majority of the market.  Not that I expect Oracle to learn this before it&#039;s too late.
IMHO an installation process that sucks on all platforms is not a good thing (being written in Java means that you first need to install Java).  For a cross-platform language Perl is probably the best choice, most server Linux systems can&#039;t be installed or booted without it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alan: I know that there are many heavy applications that use Oracle databases.  But the vast majority of database installations are on the low end.  My observation is that a good number of Oracle systems really have low end requirements.  Of the systems that I&#8217;ve run which had Oracle installed, they all could have had flat-files used for their databases without any problems.</p>
<p>Keep in mind the fact that VolksWagen bought Bentley, BMW bought Rolls-Royce Motors, and McDonalds is the world&#8217;s most profitable &#8220;restaurant&#8221; chain.  Any company that restricts itself to the high end risks becoming less profitable than one that caters for the majority of the market.  Not that I expect Oracle to learn this before it&#8217;s too late.</p>
<p>IMHO an installation process that sucks on all platforms is not a good thing (being written in Java means that you first need to install Java).  For a cross-platform language Perl is probably the best choice, most server Linux systems can&#8217;t be installed or booted without it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alan Pope</title>
		<link>http://etbe.coker.com.au/2008/02/18/oracle-unbreakable-linux/comment-page-1/#comment-12301</link>
		<dc:creator>Alan Pope</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etbe.coker.com.au/2008/02/18/oracle-unbreakable-linux/#comment-12301</guid>
		<description>Your experience of Oracle databases conflicts with my own. Over the last 10 years I&#039;ve only worked on Oracle databases which are larger than a few hundred GB, many larger than a couple of TB, all with many thousands of tables. These are SAP installations which can (ab)use the database quite hard. Whilst I agree that the Oracle installer sucks, at least it&#039;s somewhat cross platform (being written in Java) and thus provides a consistent interface for those of us installing on Linux, Windows, AIX or whatever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your experience of Oracle databases conflicts with my own. Over the last 10 years I&#8217;ve only worked on Oracle databases which are larger than a few hundred GB, many larger than a couple of TB, all with many thousands of tables. These are SAP installations which can (ab)use the database quite hard. Whilst I agree that the Oracle installer sucks, at least it&#8217;s somewhat cross platform (being written in Java) and thus provides a consistent interface for those of us installing on Linux, Windows, AIX or whatever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
