<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SoftwareFree.org Violates Blog Content Licenses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://etbe.coker.com.au/2008/01/21/softwarefreeorg-violates-blog-content-licenses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://etbe.coker.com.au/2008/01/21/softwarefreeorg-violates-blog-content-licenses/</link>
	<description>Linux, politics, and other interesting things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:09:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: sOULA</title>
		<link>http://etbe.coker.com.au/2008/01/21/softwarefreeorg-violates-blog-content-licenses/comment-page-1/#comment-13866</link>
		<dc:creator>sOULA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 May 2008 08:26:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etbe.coker.com.au/2008/01/21/softwarefreeorg-violates-blog-content-licenses/#comment-13866</guid>
		<description>its sources are used by other aggregators, but I have not seen any criticism on them.

:(   :(   :(

http://etbe.coker.com.au/2008/01/21/softwarefreeorg-violates-blog-content-licenses/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>its sources are used by other aggregators, but I have not seen any criticism on them.</p>
<p>:(   :(   :(</p>
<p><a href="http://etbe.coker.com.au/2008/01/21/softwarefreeorg-violates-blog-content-licenses/" rel="nofollow">http://etbe.coker.com.au/2008/01/21/softwarefreeorg-violates-blog-content-licenses/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blog Jacking? &#171; Helpful Linux Tidbits</title>
		<link>http://etbe.coker.com.au/2008/01/21/softwarefreeorg-violates-blog-content-licenses/comment-page-1/#comment-11919</link>
		<dc:creator>Blog Jacking? &#171; Helpful Linux Tidbits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 11:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etbe.coker.com.au/2008/01/21/softwarefreeorg-violates-blog-content-licenses/#comment-11919</guid>
		<description>[...] to think about a basic license system for blogs - and if it&#8217;s really necessary. I came across coker&#8217;s blog (another open source blogger) and began to understand that other people are having this issue too. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to think about a basic license system for blogs &#8211; and if it&#8217;s really necessary. I came across coker&#8217;s blog (another open source blogger) and began to understand that other people are having this issue too. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon</title>
		<link>http://etbe.coker.com.au/2008/01/21/softwarefreeorg-violates-blog-content-licenses/comment-page-1/#comment-11809</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 11:48:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etbe.coker.com.au/2008/01/21/softwarefreeorg-violates-blog-content-licenses/#comment-11809</guid>
		<description>Out of curiosity, are you persuing these cases as an exercise, or are you concerned about your material being aggregated?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Out of curiosity, are you persuing these cases as an exercise, or are you concerned about your material being aggregated?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George</title>
		<link>http://etbe.coker.com.au/2008/01/21/softwarefreeorg-violates-blog-content-licenses/comment-page-1/#comment-11799</link>
		<dc:creator>George</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:24:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etbe.coker.com.au/2008/01/21/softwarefreeorg-violates-blog-content-licenses/#comment-11799</guid>
		<description>I suppose they would take it down if you just asked. Sure it&#039;s not your job to hunt down such people and ask each one but if it&#039;s only now and then I would think that&#039;s the non-confrontational way of doing it.

If you want to add a notice to your Feed at the top, you might want to try this plugin for Wordpress: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scratch99.com/wordpress-plugin-feedentryheader/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Feed Entry Header&lt;/a&gt;. You can put in a simple &quot;This is licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA&quot; as a link if you so wish that will only appear in the feed. I&#039;m not involved with the plugin in any way, my friend was facing just this problem and he told me how he fixed it. Good luck!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose they would take it down if you just asked. Sure it&#8217;s not your job to hunt down such people and ask each one but if it&#8217;s only now and then I would think that&#8217;s the non-confrontational way of doing it.</p>
<p>If you want to add a notice to your Feed at the top, you might want to try this plugin for WordPress: <a href="http://www.scratch99.com/wordpress-plugin-feedentryheader/" rel="nofollow">Feed Entry Header</a>. You can put in a simple &#8220;This is licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA&#8221; as a link if you so wish that will only appear in the feed. I&#8217;m not involved with the plugin in any way, my friend was facing just this problem and he told me how he fixed it. Good luck!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Catharina</title>
		<link>http://etbe.coker.com.au/2008/01/21/softwarefreeorg-violates-blog-content-licenses/comment-page-1/#comment-11795</link>
		<dc:creator>Catharina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 12:39:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etbe.coker.com.au/2008/01/21/softwarefreeorg-violates-blog-content-licenses/#comment-11795</guid>
		<description>I see this as a very narrow minded approach. Why not just be happy for the extra attention for free software and your content. Also I doubt very much if the exposure of some google ads proof that the site has a commercial purpose as meant in the creative commons license. It looks more like they try to cut down there costs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see this as a very narrow minded approach. Why not just be happy for the extra attention for free software and your content. Also I doubt very much if the exposure of some google ads proof that the site has a commercial purpose as meant in the creative commons license. It looks more like they try to cut down there costs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fighting splog scrapers at The Musings of Chris Samuel</title>
		<link>http://etbe.coker.com.au/2008/01/21/softwarefreeorg-violates-blog-content-licenses/comment-page-1/#comment-11792</link>
		<dc:creator>Fighting splog scrapers at The Musings of Chris Samuel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etbe.coker.com.au/2008/01/21/softwarefreeorg-violates-blog-content-licenses/#comment-11792</guid>
		<description>[...] this useful information from Russell for future reference. I&#8217;ve just installed the RSS Footer plugin as recommended by the post [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] this useful information from Russell for future reference. I&#8217;ve just installed the RSS Footer plugin as recommended by the post [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

