<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DMCA and Sci-Fi</title>
	<atom:link href="http://etbe.coker.com.au/2007/09/23/dmca-and-sci-fi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://etbe.coker.com.au/2007/09/23/dmca-and-sci-fi/</link>
	<description>Linux, politics, and other interesting things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:45:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don Marti</title>
		<link>http://etbe.coker.com.au/2007/09/23/dmca-and-sci-fi/comment-page-1/#comment-4025</link>
		<dc:creator>Don Marti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 22:41:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etbe.coker.com.au/2007/09/23/dmca-and-sci-fi/#comment-4025</guid>
		<description>So if you do put a work under Creative Commons, why not just generate a statement saying &quot;I declare under penalty of perjury that the file whose SHA1 hash is 5f3e5... is under the CC-(whatever) license&quot; -- you could use a microformat for this -- and PGP-sign it?  Then let the web sites have copies, and if someone tries to abuse the DMCA, and your PGP key has enough Whuffie that they have a pretty good idea you&#039;re a real person, then they&#039;ll know it.

Or--hey kids, business model--as an author, you could allow putback-o-matic.com to generate a DMCA putback for you.  Web sites that do a takedown would send the hashes of the files taken down to putback-o-matic.com, and putback-o-matic.com sends out the DMCA putback letter for you.  If the takedown was an example of egregious DMCA abuse (which it doesn&#039;t look like the SFWA case was) then putback-o-matic.com sues the sender of the original takedown and splits the money with you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So if you do put a work under Creative Commons, why not just generate a statement saying &#8220;I declare under penalty of perjury that the file whose SHA1 hash is 5f3e5&#8230; is under the CC-(whatever) license&#8221; &#8212; you could use a microformat for this &#8212; and PGP-sign it?  Then let the web sites have copies, and if someone tries to abuse the DMCA, and your PGP key has enough Whuffie that they have a pretty good idea you&#8217;re a real person, then they&#8217;ll know it.</p>
<p>Or&#8211;hey kids, business model&#8211;as an author, you could allow putback-o-matic.com to generate a DMCA putback for you.  Web sites that do a takedown would send the hashes of the files taken down to putback-o-matic.com, and putback-o-matic.com sends out the DMCA putback letter for you.  If the takedown was an example of egregious DMCA abuse (which it doesn&#8217;t look like the SFWA case was) then putback-o-matic.com sues the sender of the original takedown and splits the money with you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

