<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Documentaries about Gifted Children</title>
	<atom:link href="http://etbe.coker.com.au/2007/07/16/documentaries-about-gifted-children/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://etbe.coker.com.au/2007/07/16/documentaries-about-gifted-children/</link>
	<description>Linux, politics, and other interesting things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 01:09:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Orr</title>
		<link>http://etbe.coker.com.au/2007/07/16/documentaries-about-gifted-children/comment-page-1/#comment-2130</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Orr</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 21:58:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etbe.coker.com.au/2007/07/16/documentaries-about-gifted-children/#comment-2130</guid>
		<description>As a teenager I competed several times in the International Maths Olympiad, and we had a succession of TV documentary makers attending our training camps.  The nature of the programmes they were making varied, and the majority never reached the TV screen, but some focussed on a particular individual, and one had a title of &quot;Genius&quot;.  The driving force behind these was always the programme-makers rather than the parents or the team leadership, and they were tolerated as a mild nuisance who gave a bit of publicity (something the Maths Olympiad rarely had).

I never quite saw the point of these programmes, but this was probably a relatively good environment to be part of them in - there were a group of similarly talented youngsters in it together, so not everyone had to have a heavy role in filming.  And any question of being told you are a &quot;genius&quot; doesn&#039;t really apply: having been chosen for the Olympiad squad already lets people know they are somewhat special.  But probably most importantly, there was an organisational structure to run the team who (at least after the first programme) had experience in dealing with programme makers and setting rules for them.  I suspect that in most of the programmes you refer to, whoever initiated them, once they had begun the parents had little control over what happened.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a teenager I competed several times in the International Maths Olympiad, and we had a succession of TV documentary makers attending our training camps.  The nature of the programmes they were making varied, and the majority never reached the TV screen, but some focussed on a particular individual, and one had a title of &#8220;Genius&#8221;.  The driving force behind these was always the programme-makers rather than the parents or the team leadership, and they were tolerated as a mild nuisance who gave a bit of publicity (something the Maths Olympiad rarely had).</p>
<p>I never quite saw the point of these programmes, but this was probably a relatively good environment to be part of them in &#8211; there were a group of similarly talented youngsters in it together, so not everyone had to have a heavy role in filming.  And any question of being told you are a &#8220;genius&#8221; doesn&#8217;t really apply: having been chosen for the Olympiad squad already lets people know they are somewhat special.  But probably most importantly, there was an organisational structure to run the team who (at least after the first programme) had experience in dealing with programme makers and setting rules for them.  I suspect that in most of the programmes you refer to, whoever initiated them, once they had begun the parents had little control over what happened.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pffft</title>
		<link>http://etbe.coker.com.au/2007/07/16/documentaries-about-gifted-children/comment-page-1/#comment-2121</link>
		<dc:creator>Pffft</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 10:17:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etbe.coker.com.au/2007/07/16/documentaries-about-gifted-children/#comment-2121</guid>
		<description>The article about the two year old is silly. I know of many advanced young children who can do much more than the child in the article at a much younger age, yet their parents would certainly not a) exploit their child this way or b) let them know they&#039;re a &#039;genius&#039;.  The parents don&#039;t even believe their child is a genius to begin with.

Telling a child they are a genius is a bad idea. Telling them on a tv documentary is both tacky and disturbing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The article about the two year old is silly. I know of many advanced young children who can do much more than the child in the article at a much younger age, yet their parents would certainly not a) exploit their child this way or b) let them know they&#8217;re a &#8216;genius&#8217;.  The parents don&#8217;t even believe their child is a genius to begin with.</p>
<p>Telling a child they are a genius is a bad idea. Telling them on a tv documentary is both tacky and disturbing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Leon Brooks</title>
		<link>http://etbe.coker.com.au/2007/07/16/documentaries-about-gifted-children/comment-page-1/#comment-2116</link>
		<dc:creator>Leon Brooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jul 2007 08:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etbe.coker.com.au/2007/07/16/documentaries-about-gifted-children/#comment-2116</guid>
		<description>+1 Insightful. (-:</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1 Insightful. (-:</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

