<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DMCA etc</title>
	<atom:link href="http://etbe.coker.com.au/2007/05/04/dmca-etc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://etbe.coker.com.au/2007/05/04/dmca-etc/</link>
	<description>Linux, politics, and other interesting things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:45:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: lemonup.com - pirates &#124; etbe</title>
		<link>http://etbe.coker.com.au/2007/05/04/dmca-etc/comment-page-1/#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>lemonup.com - pirates &#124; etbe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2007 10:37:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etbe.coker.com.au/2007/05/04/dmca-etc/#comment-119</guid>
		<description>[...] The URL http://linuxresource.lemonup.com/ currently has a mirror of my blog. Disregarding the DMCA take-down notice I sent them a week ago (which is also mirrored on their own site) they have again copied the content from my site without permission (I only allow non-commercial use). But this time they go even further and claim copyright over my text! [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The URL <a href="http://linuxresource.lemonup.com/" rel="nofollow">http://linuxresource.lemonup.com/</a> currently has a mirror of my blog. Disregarding the DMCA take-down notice I sent them a week ago (which is also mirrored on their own site) they have again copied the content from my site without permission (I only allow non-commercial use). But this time they go even further and claim copyright over my text! [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Hutchings</title>
		<link>http://etbe.coker.com.au/2007/05/04/dmca-etc/comment-page-1/#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Hutchings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 19:40:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etbe.coker.com.au/2007/05/04/dmca-etc/#comment-117</guid>
		<description>&quot;DJ Profusion&quot; is wrong. Webcasters will still have the option to licence directly. &quot;Compulsory licensing&quot; means simply that publishers cannot refuse to licence broadcasting, not that they must exclusively licence it through SoundExchange. Just how quickly SoundExchange will disburse licence fees to non-members is anyone&#039;s guess, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;DJ Profusion&#8221; is wrong. Webcasters will still have the option to licence directly. &#8220;Compulsory licensing&#8221; means simply that publishers cannot refuse to licence broadcasting, not that they must exclusively licence it through SoundExchange. Just how quickly SoundExchange will disburse licence fees to non-members is anyone&#8217;s guess, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://etbe.coker.com.au/2007/05/04/dmca-etc/comment-page-1/#comment-110</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 15:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etbe.coker.com.au/2007/05/04/dmca-etc/#comment-110</guid>
		<description>You seem confused about which law restricts the copying of the magic number; as you point out, it can&#039;t be copyright, but it can be the anti-circumvention section of the DMCA, since the key is &quot;a component&quot; of a circumvention device.

I don&#039;t think the password law in Pennsylvania that you&#039;re bringing up is relevant.

- Chris.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You seem confused about which law restricts the copying of the magic number; as you point out, it can&#8217;t be copyright, but it can be the anti-circumvention section of the DMCA, since the key is &#8220;a component&#8221; of a circumvention device.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think the password law in Pennsylvania that you&#8217;re bringing up is relevant.</p>
<p>- Chris.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: João Miguel Neves</title>
		<link>http://etbe.coker.com.au/2007/05/04/dmca-etc/comment-page-1/#comment-109</link>
		<dc:creator>João Miguel Neves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 15:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etbe.coker.com.au/2007/05/04/dmca-etc/#comment-109</guid>
		<description>Sorry, wrong discussion. AACS is NOT sending takedown notices as defined by the DMCA. The issue is not copyright infringement. They are sending cease and desist letters to end the &quot;promotion of circumvention&quot; that spreading the number does.

By the way, mathematical concepts are not copyrightable. Yes, we know how stupid that is when everything is digital (aka a number), but politicians haven&#039;t grasped that notion yet. Check the article 2 of the WIPO Copyright Treaty: http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/wct/trtdocs_wo033.html#P51_3806</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry, wrong discussion. AACS is NOT sending takedown notices as defined by the DMCA. The issue is not copyright infringement. They are sending cease and desist letters to end the &#8220;promotion of circumvention&#8221; that spreading the number does.</p>
<p>By the way, mathematical concepts are not copyrightable. Yes, we know how stupid that is when everything is digital (aka a number), but politicians haven&#8217;t grasped that notion yet. Check the article 2 of the WIPO Copyright Treaty: <a href="http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/wct/trtdocs_wo033.html#P51_3806" rel="nofollow">http://www.wipo.int/treaties/en/ip/wct/trtdocs_wo033.html#P51_3806</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

