<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: email disclaimers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://etbe.coker.com.au/2006/12/29/email-disclaimers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://etbe.coker.com.au/2006/12/29/email-disclaimers/</link>
	<description>Linux, politics, and other interesting things</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:45:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: etbe</title>
		<link>http://etbe.coker.com.au/2006/12/29/email-disclaimers/comment-page-1/#comment-10787</link>
		<dc:creator>etbe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etbe.coker.com.au/index.php/2006/12/29/email-disclaimers/#comment-10787</guid>
		<description>Jean-Marc: If my disclaimer and the other party&#039;s disclaimer are both worthless then I&#039;m happy.  If the other party&#039;s sig disclaimer has some merit then mine gets in first and wins.  In either case I win.  ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jean-Marc: If my disclaimer and the other party&#8217;s disclaimer are both worthless then I&#8217;m happy.  If the other party&#8217;s sig disclaimer has some merit then mine gets in first and wins.  In either case I win.  ;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Conditions of Sending Email &#124; etbe</title>
		<link>http://etbe.coker.com.au/2006/12/29/email-disclaimers/comment-page-1/#comment-10785</link>
		<dc:creator>Conditions of Sending Email &#124; etbe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:22:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etbe.coker.com.au/index.php/2006/12/29/email-disclaimers/#comment-10785</guid>
		<description>[...] BoingBoing and Licenses &#124; etbe on About&#187; Strike back at worthless email disclaimers on email disclaimersSerendipitous altruism on Better Social NetworkingJean-Marc Liotier on email disclaimerschrisduffer [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BoingBoing and Licenses | etbe on About&raquo; Strike back at worthless email disclaimers on email disclaimersSerendipitous altruism on Better Social NetworkingJean-Marc Liotier on email disclaimerschrisduffer [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#187; Strike back at worthless email disclaimers</title>
		<link>http://etbe.coker.com.au/2006/12/29/email-disclaimers/comment-page-1/#comment-10783</link>
		<dc:creator>&#187; Strike back at worthless email disclaimers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 13:13:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etbe.coker.com.au/index.php/2006/12/29/email-disclaimers/#comment-10783</guid>
		<description>[...] dug out an article by Russel Coker about striking back at worthless email disclaimers by configuring Postfix&#8217;s  smtpd_banner in /etc/postfix/main.cf with the appropriate legalese [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] dug out an article by Russel Coker about striking back at worthless email disclaimers by configuring Postfix&#8217;s  smtpd_banner in /etc/postfix/main.cf with the appropriate legalese [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jean-Marc Liotier</title>
		<link>http://etbe.coker.com.au/2006/12/29/email-disclaimers/comment-page-1/#comment-10780</link>
		<dc:creator>Jean-Marc Liotier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Nov 2007 12:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://etbe.coker.com.au/index.php/2006/12/29/email-disclaimers/#comment-10780</guid>
		<description>Good idea - I guess that this is legally as worthless as non negotiated signature legalese, but at least it is way more fun and neatly underlines how stupid unilateral contracts are.

I modified the example proposed by http://smallprint.netzoo.net/reag/ to make it more comprehensive - though it would probably require Postfix&#039;s multiline smtpd_banner patch found at http://ftp.wl0.org/openpkg/postfix/postfix-2.1.4-multiline-greeting.diff

READ CAREFULLY. By transmitting email to this server you agree personally and on behalf of your employer or organization, to release the recipients from all obligations and waivers arising from any and all NON-NEGOTIATED agreements, licenses, terms-of-service, shrinkwrap, clickwrap, browsewrap, confidentiality, non-disclosure, non-compete and acceptable use policies (”BOGUS AGREEMENTS”) that I have entered into with your employer, its partners, licensors, agents and assigns, in perpetuity, without prejudice to the recipient&#039;s ongoing rights and privileges. You further represent that you have the authority to release the recipients from any BOGUS AGREEMENTS on behalf of your employer or organization.

But maybe it&#039;ll fit on a single line... Gotta check !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good idea &#8211; I guess that this is legally as worthless as non negotiated signature legalese, but at least it is way more fun and neatly underlines how stupid unilateral contracts are.</p>
<p>I modified the example proposed by <a href="http://smallprint.netzoo.net/reag/" rel="nofollow">http://smallprint.netzoo.net/reag/</a> to make it more comprehensive &#8211; though it would probably require Postfix&#8217;s multiline smtpd_banner patch found at <a href="http://ftp.wl0.org/openpkg/postfix/postfix-2.1.4-multiline-greeting.diff" rel="nofollow">http://ftp.wl0.org/openpkg/postfix/postfix-2.1.4-multiline-greeting.diff</a></p>
<p>READ CAREFULLY. By transmitting email to this server you agree personally and on behalf of your employer or organization, to release the recipients from all obligations and waivers arising from any and all NON-NEGOTIATED agreements, licenses, terms-of-service, shrinkwrap, clickwrap, browsewrap, confidentiality, non-disclosure, non-compete and acceptable use policies (”BOGUS AGREEMENTS”) that I have entered into with your employer, its partners, licensors, agents and assigns, in perpetuity, without prejudice to the recipient&#8217;s ongoing rights and privileges. You further represent that you have the authority to release the recipients from any BOGUS AGREEMENTS on behalf of your employer or organization.</p>
<p>But maybe it&#8217;ll fit on a single line&#8230; Gotta check !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

